But we have a new logo!

[image] bre: so I’m trying to understand what need is not being met. Ok so, sorry about the tone, but I am really angry about it. All I can say is that I find the current situation really not satisfying. Honestly speaking quite a disaster unfolded and management is silent. I get this uneasy s…

If it’s not too much trouble, what exactly was hostile and warranted a flagged reply?

[image] Mitsos: 18 days has been updating the storj logo and making sure it’s pretty. There has been absolutely NO testing performed on the trash improvements, I’d say logo update is way more important than some bug clearing out trash. No sarcasm. Logo brings money. Clearing out trash doesn’…

[image] arrogantrabbit: Clearing out trash doesn’t. One more reason why trash should be paid.

I’m sorry, that you thinks that’s the case. We tested the trash behavior and it worked correctly, however, I think that we didn’t test several downgrades and upgrades, because it was not expected that we would need to downgrade. Regarding not updated databases after the trash chore perhaps there i…

@Mitsos The simple answer is technical work regarding trash and marketing work regarding logos are done by entirely different teams, as in most companies. The technical issues you point to are not things that can be solved by the the people who worked very hard on the rebranding project. It’s impo…

bre, I get that. My flagged reply above would have led to “no they do not have commit access because they may introduce a bug without the developers having time to react to it” and my next reply would have been “so the developers actually had to devote some of their time to draft a commit, do all th…

I’m glad you understand what I am saying, and that you have been able to say the rest of what you meant. Please be assured that the trash issue is being attended to as discussed in depth in other threads.

[image] bre: as discussed in depth in other threads. I would be happy if some of the higher ranks would take part in these discussions. When I read quotes like this [image] Trash does not go away in 7 days We’re working on quite a few long-needed storagenode performance improvements right…

[image] jammerdan: it appears that long needed improvements have not been adequately addressed and required resources not allocated. The part about required resources is wrong. First priority is and always was to fill the drive with paid customer data. That part deserves as many resources as …

I have to say, I just don’t see the point of this topic. I understand that sometimes people just need to vent, but there is no new information mentioned, no specific actions requested and all topics mentioned have different threads with active engagement from Storjlings. Attitude makes such a big d…

Storj Community Forum (official)

A new logo for storagenode

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled