Ok, but my opinion has not changed. They are trying to contain us.
It just happens that I traveling a lot. In all countries where I lived it’s the same - something is blocked this way or another.
I may also add Kazakhstan to the list.
I am not trying to convince you, I am just stating my findings. You can believe whatever you want to believe. But fact is from https://www.uscourts.gov/federal-court-finder/find?f[0]=usc_court_type%3ABankruptcy%20Court I randomly selected 3 different court sites and those worked additionally to the ones that I already know that are working. So to me this proves that there is no intent to make those generally inaccessible from outside of the US.
Some nice summary from Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/storj/comments/1ws2f5q/storj_bankruptcy_case_moved_to_georgia_claims_bar/
Hey all. I've been watching the Storj Labs bankruptcy docket and figured I'd share a plain English rundown, since a bunch has happened in the last couple weeks that hasn't really come up here. All of this is from the public docket on CourtListener. I'm a node operator, not a lawyer, so this isn't legal advice.What has happened
Storj Labs filed Chapter 11 on July 26, 2026 in West Virginia (case 5:26-bk-00512).
Then came the venue fight. Creditor counsel moved to dismiss or transfer, and the debtor tried to strike their motion. On Sept 17 the court denied the strike, and on Sept 18 it ordered the case transferred, finding West Virginia was the wrong venue.
So the case moved to the Northern District of Georgia, opening there Sept 21 as case 26-62642. Georgia’s docket is live on CourtListener (updated through at least Sept 27).
Lately: the U.S. Trustee has shown up, the court set another interim hearing on financing and cash collateral, and on Sept 27 someone filed a “Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order” (no public details yet).
What it means if Storj owes you money
The case was transferred, not dismissed, so the claims process is still rolling in Georgia.
Big one: the claims bar date is October 5, 2026 for regular claims. The transfer didn’t change it, so treat it as firm unless the Georgia court says otherwise. (Government claims get until January 22, 2027.)
Storj listed node operator liability as one lump sum (about $296k, c/o Storj Finance in Atlanta), not operator by operator. So if you’re owed money (held back balance, unpaid earnings, whatever), the way to make it official is a proof of claim on Official Form 410.
One heads up: if you filed in West Virginia before the transfer, the Georgia docket on CourtListener doesn’t show individual claims yet. Worth checking that yours made it onto the Georgia claims register (PACER) before the bar date, and refiling in Georgia if anything looks off. Transferred claims normally carry over, but the public record is pretty thin right now.
How to file (before October 5)
Easiest path: the Georgia bankruptcy court’s Electronic Proof of Claim page (ePOC). No account, no fee, open 24/7, and you get a file stamped copy immediately. (Quick note: the court’s page says ePOC doesn’t work in Chrome, so use Firefox, Safari, or Edge.)
You’ll need the case number 26-62642, your name and address as the creditor, how much you’re owed and why (unpaid node earnings, held back balance, etc.), plus any supporting docs. Strip out personal identifiers (SSN, account numbers, birth dates) from anything you attach.
Prefer paper? Mail Official Form 410 to Vania S. Allen, Clerk of Court, 1340 United States Courthouse, 75 Ted Turner Drive SW, Atlanta, GA 30303. There’s no private claims agent on this one, claims go straight to the clerk.
I’ll try to keep watching the docket and will update this if anything big drops before the bar date.
Thai reeks of being an AI summary of docket notes. And no disclosure about this being an AI vomit.
I don’t care what tool was used to create a summary: if the results are accurate and presented well.
I do. It’s ok to use tools to help information gathering, planning, and what not. It’s not ok to outsource the brain. The human still has to supply the judgment: what is true, what matters, and what makes it into the final text. Without this layer you get slop
And to your point: we don’t know if it’s accurate. Because the op used AI to generate the text too, and there is no indication they independently verified it. There is also no indication they did much editing, because the LLMisms are still all over the writing.
And I did ask my GPT Pro to fact check. It found one clear factual error, plus several unsupported or overbroad claims. I didn’t factcheck that factcheck. Which is sort of the point
I’m willing to die on this hill. If someone posts “tools” output unadulterated, they have outsourced the only part that matters and it’s not ok.
Since the billing quarter ends today, if you have a PACER and CourtListener account and some free credits left, you can help other users by retrieving court documents they’ve requested from other cases. The most frequently requested documents are listed here:
For now.. I like the new judge 
It’s very entertaining to hear him telling them what he is not interested in 
These 2 guys are still objecting