# Average usage reporting lower than disk space used?

**URL:** <https://forum.storj.io/t/average-usage-reporting-lower-than-disk-space-used/28881>\
**Category:** troubleshooting\
**Created:** [December 22, 2024, 1:50am UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/average-usage-reporting-lower-than-disk-space-used/28881 "2024-12-22T01:50:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alexey](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/user_avatar/forum.storj.io/alexey/32/41_2.png) [@Alexey](https://forum.storj.io/u/Alexey)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2024, 12:26pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/average-usage-reporting-lower-than-disk-space-used/28881/6 "2024-12-22T12:26:01Z")

</div>

No, this is a usual gap problem because the node’s code treating NULLs as 0, instead of ignoring and do not counting this day.  
See

> [@Avg disk space used dropped with 60-70%](https://forum.storj.io/t/avg-disk-space-used-dropped-with-60-70/26495):
>
> Is this something with the satellite again? Or just deletion of 300TB+ of data?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.storj.io/t/average-usage-reporting-lower-than-disk-space-used/28881)._