# Bandwidth utilization comparison thread **URL:** \ **Category:** FAQ\ **Tags:** monitoring, bandwidth, web-dashboard, multiple-nodes\ **Created:** [July 4, 2020, 7:08am UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/bandwidth-utilization-comparison-thread/7960 "2020-07-04T07:08:19Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 1067
**Author:** ![kevink](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/user_avatar/forum.storj.io/kevink/32/6077_2.png) [@kevink](https://forum.storj.io/u/kevink)\ **Post date:** [December 13, 2020, 9:03am UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/bandwidth-utilization-comparison-thread/7960/1067 "2020-12-13T09:03:03Z")
my unvetted nodes got 2.7GB ingress yesterday (both combined since same subnet). My vetted node got 12GB. So currently that’s 22.5% of the ingress of a vetted node. So it’s still a long way from a vetted node actually only receiving 5% of a vetted node. So this system is actually faster for unvetted nodes. However, it also depends on generall infress: > [@Satellite vetting and traffic comparison](https://forum.storj.io/t/satellite-vetting-and-traffic-comparison/10380/5): > > It depends on the number of nodes being vetted on that satellite. For example if a satellite has 5000 nodes (/24 ipv4 subnets), a single node would get 95%/5000=0.019% of all traffic. If that satellite has only 100 unvetted nodes, a single unvetted node would get 5%/100=0.05% of all traffic. So in this example the unvetted nodes would even get more ingress traffic than a regular node. The speed difference between vetting on different satellites is also explained by the difference in ingress amo… I have 2 unvetted nodes on the same subnet so vetting will take them longer. They are both 1 month old now and vetting is done 11% (europe-north) up to 54% (on saltlake). --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.storj.io/t/bandwidth-utilization-comparison-thread/7960)._