Earnings calculator (Update 2024-04-14: v13.4.0 - Additional info on uncollected garbage and unpaid data - Detailed earnings info and health status of your node, including vetting progress)

Alexey · January 10, 2023, 4:28am

17 posts were split to a new topic: I’m confused by the results of the calculator and the dashboard

Salman · January 15, 2023, 4:56pm

why my usde space only half of it real space
v1.69.2

BrightSilence · January 15, 2023, 9:47pm

I’m not sure. Garbage collection should have cleaned up the majority of stale data by now. Have you had any performance issues with your node?

snorkel · January 16, 2023, 12:25am

I just realised… in the newest version, the Reputation fields are empty. Is this on purpose? Or some king of bug?

Salman · January 16, 2023, 2:40am

actually my node is normal，and my other 4 nodes have the same problem

BrightSilence · January 16, 2023, 9:21am

They are empty if you use a month parameter (and always have been empty in that scenario). This is because there is no historic reputation info. Omit that parameter and the reputation will be filled.

Then I’m not sure how that happened. What I can say is that this means the satellites think you have a lot less data on your node than your node itself does. This can happen if you missed deletes by being offline, or lost a lot of races to get pieces within the first 80 nodes. However, normally garbage collection would clean that up. I made those debug lines to show this issue when garbage collection was disabled for a while. At that time it was expected for there to be a mismatch. But it has been reenabled for a while now and it should have already been cleaned up. So I have no explanation for such a massive discrepancy between the two numbers.

Roberto · January 16, 2023, 10:52am

It is a known bug of dashnoard v.1.70.2

BrightSilence · January 16, 2023, 11:00am

I see that dashboard bug on some of my nodes, but my calculator still displays correct values on those nodes. So I’m not convinced this is the same issue.

Alexey · January 18, 2023, 4:06am

You are correct - v1.70.2 has issue with displaying the disk usage on the graph, but I see a previous version on the screenshot, so it’s something different - like corrupted databases.
@Salman could you please check your databases?

And also - when you hover mouse above graph - how much TB used it displays?

Alexey · January 30, 2023, 5:00am

A post was split to a new topic: Disk usage graph discrepancy in v1.69.2

HGPlays · March 22, 2023, 2:38pm

Hello - i have this problem when running the earnings script:

Alexey · March 23, 2023, 2:52am

Perhaps your databases got corrupted, please check them:

HGPlays · March 23, 2023, 7:10am

I can check but its a brand new node - runnning just fine. So whould be weird

BrightSilence · March 23, 2023, 7:29am

What node version are you running? And are you using the latest version of this script?

HGPlays · March 23, 2023, 7:30am

1.74.1 - is my current version

BrightSilence · March 23, 2023, 7:32am

The folder name suggests you’re running an old version of this script. Please download the latest. This error popped up when Storj made changes in the database layout, but it has long since been fixed in the earnings script.

HGPlays · March 23, 2023, 7:58am

Maybe im dumb Can you send a link to the newest version - i cant seem to find it

BrightSilence · March 23, 2023, 8:00am

All the links are in the top post. It’s tagged as the latest version on github, there are direct links to the latest version and even a CLI command to get the latest version. I’m not sure what else I can link to get you there…

HGPlays · March 23, 2023, 8:10am

Sorry i will get the newest version - must have just downloaded an older one

BrightSilence · April 20, 2023, 11:07am

I have a pretty big update today. Due to the upcoming changes to payouts as well as upcoming community satellites, the calculator needed to be updated to be able to handle different payout schemes per satellite. This required some more extensive changes to both the code and layout as payout details were hard coded before and the layout didn’t allow for different payout schemes. I used this opportunity to also split out storage, egress and repair payouts on the per satellite view to aid in making decisions to exit specific satellites.
As part of this change, the listed payout rates in the top overview now show a calculated weighted average across satellites. While per satellite payout rates are listed in the bottom overview.

I’m looking forward to your feedback. Since this was a larger refactor than normal, issues might occur. Please feel free to report them and I will look into fixing them asap.

Note: this new version uses pricing.db to source payout information. If you copy db’s before running the script, make sure you include this db from now on.

Known issues

Payout details in the storagenode db’s do not include historic information. As a result, internal calculations for payouts in historic months will display wrong information if a satellite has changed payout schemes since then. There isn’t much I can do about this unless Storj Labs chooses to add historic data for this.
When satellites use a long name and you have a warning status, the layout may break. This won’t happen on current production satellites, but might happen on test/community satellites or future production satellites if the names are longer.

Changelog

v13.0.0 - Refactor for different payout schemes per satellite

Calculate weighted average payout per TB for top overview
Add payout scheme per satellite
Split out payouts for storage, egress and repair/audit
Add estimated total by end of month to per satellite overview
Change layout to keep output compact with newly data added
Source payout data from pricing.db instead of hard coded (note: new db required to use the script)