# Failed to add bandwith usage

**URL:** <https://forum.storj.io/t/failed-to-add-bandwith-usage/23900>\
**Category:** troubleshooting\
**Tags:** docker, xfs, database, unraid\
**Created:** [October 1, 2023, 2:06pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/failed-to-add-bandwith-usage/23900 "2023-10-01T14:06:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 29

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pascal51882](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/user_avatar/forum.storj.io/pascal51882/32/63_2.png) [@Pascal51882](https://forum.storj.io/u/Pascal51882)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2023, 3:00pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/failed-to-add-bandwith-usage/23900/29 "2023-10-20T15:00:46Z")

</div>

So you would prefer ZFS? What are the benefits and down sides?

I just want to ad this post:

> [@BTRFS vs EXT4 vs ZFS Filesystem for storj](https://forum.storj.io/t/btrfs-vs-ext4-vs-zfs-filesystem-for-storj/18069/2):
>
> Your assumptions are correct, the best FS for Storj on Linux is ext4. BTRFS is not good for Storj, it’s also not production ready. The only normally working implementation is on Synology. ZFS is useful only when you want to have all its features and ready to put up with shortcomings, including the slow operation of this FS (in comparison with ext4). It’s useless without more than one disk (for mirror) or at least three for raidz. See

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.storj.io/t/failed-to-add-bandwith-usage/23900)._
