Hi, I’ve suddenly received an email with title “Your Node Is Disqualified on the saltlake Satellite”. Actually, just in few days ago, my office(where i hosting storj node)'s firewall policy had changed, so one can’t access node from internet, but I didn’t aware of that, untill I got this email. Acco…

[image] Alexey: And now I want to know - why do you want to know that? Do you want to try to use? Because without this knowledge I don’t know how to make the proposal from the other thread better. From my side your argument is essentially «I don’t like it, but I won’t tell you why». That’s n…

Yes, I could definitely see that working. It would slow down the disqualification without giving abusers a way to get out of an audit and also give an earlier warning due to disqualification. It checks all the boxes I think. What I don’t like about it is the added complexity and having to track dif…

The current system will account suspended node as unhealthy in the repair worker (ergo pieces considered as lost), so this checkbox already closed. The audit score could be affected if the repair worker would hit the exact this piece (as far as I understand the repair workers doesn’t share the logic…

The constructive argument - the suspension for timeouts is too easy to exploit and it will be. I’ll not describe details how to exactly exploit the suspension for timeouts to do not make it happen or make it easier to find a loophole. Details are not needed to make idea with suspension for timeouts…

Looks like we’re getting somewhere good. [image] Alexey: The audit score could be affected if the repair worker would hit the exact this piece (as far as I understand the repair workers doesn’t share the logic with audit workers, their logic is much stricter than on audits). At the time it w…

I guess a suspended node should not be paid. So there is no incentive to game audits. Instead there is an incentive to look after the node on a regular basis. On the other hand a node in suspension should only slowly move towards disqualification to give a SNO time to fix issues. What just came int…

It only audits the same piece 10x if it times out. When there is a definitive fail response like file not found, it’s just an instant audit failure and moves on to the next one right away.

If piece is deleted by the customer, it should be removed from the audit queue too, so unlikely it will be audited if it’s marked as should be (or already) deleted.

I just wanted to make aware of such a scenario where a node cannot provide the piece and put into suspension mode and then the piece gets deleted by customer. In such case the ongoing suspension, leaving suspension mode or disqualification should not depend on this specific piece(s) as the node woul…

We discuss the disqualification for audit timeouts. If the deleted piece would be audited - the node will return “file not found” and immediately fail the audit. The suspension for missed files even more dangerous for the network than suspension for timeouts.

Storj Community Forum (official)

Got Disqualified from saltlake

Node Operators troubleshooting

disqualification

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled