Interesting what datacenter is down?

[daki82]

@MattJE96011

On the other hand, you’d be better off arguing about node incubation in terms of the held amount which would actually carry some weight. However if Storj sees this as an issue, the simple solution would be to forego the current holding model for one that simply holds a specific amount proportional to the repair cost relative to the size of the node that adjusts over time as opposed to an ambiguous figure based on node performance during a predetermined period of time. End of discussion.

wich i proposed here, with voting

Proposed changes to the method how Held Amount is collected

As i stumbled across this forum, i noticed the problem goes deeper than just a “deposit”. To be reliable, profitable, protected from harm through bad willing strangers, and fair for all Nodes there must be an held amount. It must be connected to the age of the node AND the size it is filled. i would suggest: StorJ seizes one specific amount after: A: the node reaches a specific age, no matter how small filled it is. AND B: when the node reaches an defined size of used disk space. i call…

@bre is that the living discussion you are seaching for, to rework held?