# No bloom filters from US1

**URL:** <https://forum.storj.io/t/no-bloom-filters-from-us1/28637>\
**Category:** Node Operators\
**Tags:** bloom-filter, us1-satellite\
**Created:** [November 25, 2024, 5:15pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/no-bloom-filters-from-us1/28637 "2024-11-25T17:15:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 52

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Toyoo](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/user_avatar/forum.storj.io/toyoo/32/1126_2.png) [@Toyoo](https://forum.storj.io/u/Toyoo)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2025, 12:46am UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/no-bloom-filters-from-us1/28637/52 "2025-02-11T00:46:09Z")

</div>

More likely, BF for subdirectories 22…2z, then another for 3a…3z, etc. Would require node code changes though.

But, this process is only bound by RAM because the implementation is deliberately simple. There is a proof-[of-concept piece of code](https://forum.storj.io/t/current-situation-with-garbage-collection/25711/274) that does it with rather insignificant RAM usage.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.storj.io/t/no-bloom-filters-from-us1/28637)._