@littleskunk I see! Makes sense: That does not surprise me that some kind of clever algorithm takes into account the last audits for gauging how reliable the node is ![]()
However, what happened to satellite “Europe North” is weird then: It had a score of 1 and took an incredible bad hit (1 to 0.875) because of one failed audit the 22nd of Aug ![]()

I mean… 3 failed audits in a row like this one and the Node is gone for good on this satellite!
However, I do not have the score history before that, so maybe it had other failed audits, but if it was the case I wouldn’t have expected its score to have come back up to a score of 1 already, it seems like recovering from failed audits usually takes time.