:latin_cross: crossed_fingers: crossed_fingers: This forum topic supposed to give more insights about Storagenode operations Similar to https://status.storj.io/ , but focused to SN This may help in case of debugging issues, but shouldn’t be required to be followed for normal operation Please consid…

I can unpin it, seems it’s not updated for a long time. The pin can be discarded by the user. By the way, it’s a wiki, so the Community can keep it updated, but seems no one want to do it :person_shrugging: poll

I would prefer history in ascending time order, to easily follow I am fine with both sort orders. But having the latest news on top, helps to understand recent changes faster, IMHO. You don’t need to scroll to down. (Eventually we will have lot of events, but we can prune it to an archive post af…

Great Job, Storj Number One of Cloud Distributed Storage

[image] elek: reverse-time order is more change-log style I completely agree. I think the label “History” automatically makes us want to see things in chronological order in order to see the progress. While in terms of changelog, a user is going to use the latest version of the software hence…

New at the top makes the most sense. And thank you for using the YYYY-MM-DD syntax as the ISO intended… and not some bass-ackward Americanism :wink:

Or just a sortable table, so everyone can choose his ordering :wink:

I think that we can use a history of edits for this regards?

we are not all from Americas :wink:

Do you know, how it could be showed on the forum? Perhaps only the table view, but I’m not sure that it could be sorted without editing…

I would suggest that instead of making this into a complete changelog, only the important dates+versions+info should be kept. Ie: 2024-04-15 v1.101.3 storagenode rollout has been started (instead of continuing v1.100) save-state-resume feature for GC filewalker 2a8d0d44a important gc file walker…

[image] Mitsos: I would suggest that instead of making this into a complete changelog, only the important dates+versions+info should be kept. Yes, my idea was to put the important, actual information under Current status, and keep History for posterity… Probably the warning about v1.100 dese…

Storj Community Forum (official)

Storagenode Operational updates

Node Operators

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled