Then why is nobody doing it?
That used to be common here. 20 years ago though, nobody is stupid enough to do that now.
Oh, you are right. I have had a similar issue in my current location, the WiFi router (which I do not control) has enabled IPv6, but their ISP seems didn’t route IPv6. This forum platform sometimes was unable to load in my browser, I always have had issues with timeouts, “you connected with 340Mbit, but here is no internet”, etc.
As soon as I disabled IPv6 in the adapter - all hangs, errors and long loads are magically disappear.
Добрый день.
Какой объем трафика в месяц нормальный для ноды объемом 4Тб ? рассуждая логически, если storj заполнил и хранит 4Тб, то должен остаться только контрольный трафик, и исходящий, когда кто-то запрашивает сохраненные данные.
Bro! This turns out to be 1700 GB for X+100 USD?
But what if you have 2300GB+ per day?
This is not enough even for one day for the storj.
Don’t buy anything for storj.
How does this all fit together and work?
It does not matter. On a non-unlimited plan max you will overpay is $100 regardless of how much traffic you use. It’s a safety net.
For $30/month you can get unlimited data. I already had this addon for my other needs. I did not buy it for storj. So this works as intended. So far.
Sharing my unlimited experience from Arizona, USA using Cox cable internet. I have 1000Mbps down and 100Mbps up which was recently upgraded from 35Mbps up which is insanely asymmetrical. I also have the unlimited upgrade as normally you get a fee after 1.25TB for your monthly cycle. I’ve been using 3-4TB per cycle for over a year with it recently going up due to the new ingress traffic. I’ve had no issues.
I work from home and would be above the limit even excluding my 4 storage nodes. QOS via my edgerouterX has been most helpful making sure I don’t turn into a potato on video conferences when working hard to support partners and customers.
3 Likes
You are lucky the next-gen updates reached your area. 35 is still the max for me, with no ETA of upgrades. Middle of the Silicon Valley, no less. Very baffling.
Same. Node traffic does not make much difference:
Ubiquiti is very good at that. Whatever tuning they did (with CoDel + HTB, IIRC) is magic.
2 Likes
Well, the specifically discourage the use of Smart Queues on the UDM Pro for connections above 300Mbit
I don’t know what’s going on at my place, something is fishy. I have about 6 nodes running behind one IP address. My nodes don’t seem to go above an aggregate of about 300Mbps and latency really gets quite high. Also, it kills my upstream bandwidth.
UDM Pro should handle all those connections, surely? CPU and RAM usage on it are in the 60%ish range.
I’m confused.
I see that recommendation and disregard it. I have gigabit downstream, and docsis3 modem, that has its own qos, and yet, SmartQueues definitely help — as evidenced even by ubiquiti’s own latency graph.
I’m confused. Didn’t you not enable SmartQueues? Or do you have horrible latency with SmartQueues enabled? Do you have correct limits set there?
1 Like
Those are the symptoms with Smart Queues disabled.
I have 1Gbps down and 110Mbps up on this particular line. I still don’t understand how I can be getting “symptoms” when the downstream is barely half saturated (and even less than that for the upstream)
I’ve just enabled Smart Queues on that line and give it a day or so and see if it makes a difference.
In the meantime I’m upgrading the other line to 1Gbps symmetrical and see if I can shift more nodes to that one when the upgrade comes through 
it can be possible, that providers oversell there capabilities. You can go up to gigabit for short time, if if you use traffic all the time non stop, other users also use it, in some level the pipe is small. Providers sell usually several 500 Mbit, but main line only gigabit for them all, that people dont use it together on full speed. I like with electricity, you have in apartments 3x25Amps, but on fool with 5 apartments only 3x64Apms main switch for all of them.
Well, this is GPON, so yes, there will be contention on the lines. But I see the same traffic pattern for the whole 24 hours of the day.
If it was just contention with user users I should see better performance during off-peak hours.
I am not willing to test that hypothesis by getting a Leased Line connected to my house 
The second line is based on XGS-PON so when that goes up to gigabit I will be interested to see what happens
There is no normal/nominal traffic, the usage depends on the customers. Your node might be lucky to got a piece of a very popular file and if your node is fast enough to keep up and would be always a winner in the node selection and got a maximum allowed upstream bandwidth for the month 24/7. In that case the usage might be (Your upstream bandwidth) * (24 * 3600 * 30) / 1TB.
на русском
Тут нет нормального или номинального трафика, потому что использование зависит от клиента, а не от железа. Вашему узлу может повезти получить кусочек очень популярного файла и оказаться настолько быстрым, чтобы всегда выигрывать при выборе узлов для скачивания клиентами. В этом случае максимальное использование может оказаться равным вашей восходящей пропускной способности использованной в течение месяца 24/7.