# Unusually high bandwidth

**URL:** <https://forum.storj.io/t/unusually-high-bandwidth/23143>\
**Category:** troubleshooting\
**Tags:** docker, bandwidth, linux\
**Created:** [July 3, 2023, 11:57pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/unusually-high-bandwidth/23143 "2023-07-03T23:57:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nodemansland](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/letter_avatar/nodemansland/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@Nodemansland](https://forum.storj.io/u/Nodemansland)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2023, 11:57pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/unusually-high-bandwidth/23143/1 "2023-07-03T23:57:46Z")

</div>

So, I’m not exactly sure what has happened here. I started two new nodes on one of my servers and my bandwidth spiked through the roof. I’m assuming its because I changed the net.core.rmem\_max value to the recommended value of 2500000? Would this cause an increase in bandwidth?

What is the default value for ubuntu?

 ![HDCOLO2227](https://storj-s3.bcdn.literatehosting.net/original/2X/2/22943376d39e30f37ecad1182d40531f63eceb59.png)  
 ![HDCOLO2227 (1)](https://storj-s3.bcdn.literatehosting.net/original/2X/3/3855c9979104eabd652627fbadb158104f96d3fa.png)

In the mean time I’ve cut the value in half to 1250000 to see if this helps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alexey](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/user_avatar/forum.storj.io/alexey/32/41_2.png) [@Alexey](https://forum.storj.io/u/Alexey)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2023, 4:03am UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/unusually-high-bandwidth/23143/2 "2023-07-04T04:03:25Z")

</div>

It’s likely related to the customers activity, not your changes. However, if this initial change helped to fix QUIC, your node just win more customers.  
I do not see a reason why do you need to make it less popular?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![peter\_linder](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/letter_avatar/peter_linder/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@peter\_linder](https://forum.storj.io/u/peter_linder)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2023, 8:52am UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/unusually-high-bandwidth/23143/3 "2023-07-04T08:52:39Z")

</div>

A typical storagenode uses a few mbit/s of internet bandwidth (average, actual usage is a little bursty/spikey but seldom exceeds 20mbit/s for more than a few seconds)

Your graph shows much higher usage. I can only conclude the traffic is something unrelated to the storagenodes you run.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nodemansland](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/letter_avatar/nodemansland/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@Nodemansland](https://forum.storj.io/u/Nodemansland)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2023, 9:27am UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/unusually-high-bandwidth/23143/4 "2023-07-04T09:27:00Z")

</div>

After further investigation, it was an internal transfer that just happened to start when I started the two nodes causing the spike, not node traffic. Thanks for the replies~
