Oh, not over again about that malwritten ToS only @Alexey and some other people seem to know what’s in the spirit of the ToS although not being written there… Kept upright, with many bogus explanations that never will survive a trial.
The update mentioned in One or multiple nodes behind one IP, is already being waited for over a year now.
And this is actually a repeat discussion of that topic and this topic: Revisiting the Question: Feasibility of Large-Scale Storj Nodes - #33 by JWvdV
Which I remember to be very counterproductive, especially since STORJ seems to like the ambiguity and no one can actually explain the meaning and real authority of the ToS anymore ![]()
Let it go…