# Wireguard + VPS: need help for QUIC

**URL:** <https://forum.storj.io/t/wireguard-vps-need-help-for-quic/31356>\
**Category:** troubleshooting\
**Tags:** quic-udp, vpn\
**Created:** [January 7, 2026, 9:05pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/wireguard-vps-need-help-for-quic/31356 "2026-01-07T21:05:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![arrogantrabbit](https://storj.bcdn.literatehosting.com/user_avatar/forum.storj.io/arrogantrabbit/32/11200_2.png) [@arrogantrabbit](https://forum.storj.io/u/arrogantrabbit)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2026, 9:56pm UTC](https://forum.storj.io/t/wireguard-vps-need-help-for-quic/31356/2 "2026-01-07T21:56:21Z")

</div>

TLDR: your QUIC issue may not be related to routing. But it’s not worth debugging, ignore.

This approach works and preserves source IPs for log analissys later:

> **[Hosting services behind a restrictive firewall/CGNAT using DNAT on a VPS...](https://blog.arrogantrabbit.com/vpn/net/Wireguard-DNAT-and-IPTABLES/)**
>
> This is a short description of how to host services, using STORJ node as an example, on a host behind CG-NAT, or otherwise restrictive firewall, by forwarding packets through WireGuard endpoint on a relatively fast nearby VPS. This is not specific to...

This may help workaround QUIC binding:

> [@Binding to a specific interface to stabilize QUIC connectivity](https://forum.storj.io/t/binding-to-a-specific-interface-to-stabilize-quic-connectivity/23601):
>
> TLDR: if you are having flaky QUIC connectivity, go to the config file, and add an explicit interface address to the line server address line. e.g.: server.address: 10.0.17.120:28967 Backstory: I noticed that this morning, at 7:30PM PST according to the logs all three my nodes on three separate machines, in three separate states, connected in two different ways (one directly, and the other two over VPS) all lost ability to see QUICK. It was rather bizarre, and I don’t know why that happened. Th…

Ultimately, the guidance is to ignore:

> [@QUIC misconfiguration in v1.86.1](https://forum.storj.io/t/quic-misconfiguration-in-v1-86-1/23610/25):
>
> There hasn’t been any progress on those QUIC bugs. It’s considered low priority because apparently uplinks quite rarely use QUIC in production. I suppose we’re recommending not to worry about what the dashboard says about your QUIC status for now.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.storj.io/t/wireguard-vps-need-help-for-quic/31356)._
