@Krystof well your reply kinda gave me an idea… the numbers was deviation a good deal… so adding all the ingress into one might be the way to go…
so i tried that and got
July 3rd
@dragonhogan = total ingress 17.75 GB
@Mark = total ingress 18.17 GB
@striker43 = incomplete dataset
@SGC = total ingress 17.40 GB
thats less than less than 10% deviation and i had stability issues, the mark and hogan is within like 2.5%
4th July
Mark = 57,97
SGC = 55,32 (still with stability issues
@kevink = 48.05 (seems slightly off, but have been changing/tinker numbers of nodes)
striker43 = 57,75 (i will assume mark and striker are the two accurate numbers here)
so accurate… (if we ofc remove the deviants xD me and kevink)
dragonhogan - 57,03
July 5th
striker43 - total 105,81
SGC - total 104,20
Kevink - total 106,07
Krystof - total 106,15
dragonhogan - total 101,62
the mighty geek - total 105,45
yeah i think it looks like it pretty damn near perfectly spot on…
sorry about my numbers being slightly inaccurately… i also f’ed them for today…
was testing a node emergency shutdown script… ended up giving myself 1hr and 40min down time …tsk tsk…
but will be fun to see how that looks tomorrow… now i know almost exactly how long i was down for then i might be able to guess i would be that far off from the daily total…
i think we can pretty safely conclude, that multiple nodes vs single nodes, and successrates have basically zero impact… atleast on the numbers that the webdashboard gives us…
ofc we can keep monitoring until we grow bored… ill keep posting my daily screenshots for a while atleast… maybe we will learn something unexpected even tho i kinda doubt it…
however i think we can clearly say that the satellites doesn’t seem to distribute the data randomly, they have some sort of structure to their decision making else the numbers would never get so damn close…