It is difficult to believe that none of the programmers at Storj have the skill to actually write a script to remove old satellites automatically when they push an update.
Same here. I had run the forget-satellites command before toda and still received the offline notification today morning. Seems like a minor bug there.
I try to make it one button click in my toolbox but getting error
command is RunCommandCom(“”“C:\Program Files\Storj\Storage Node\storagenode.exe”“”, "forget-satellite --all-untrusted --identity-dir " & Iden & " --config-dir " & conf & " --server.private-address " & PrivateAdd, True)
but getting error
2023-10-11T14:07:56+03:00 INFO Anonymized tracing enabled {“process”: “storagenode”}
Error: cannot specify both satellite IDs and --all-untrusted
I get it even if i make it in CMD
C:\Program Files\Storj\Storage Node>storagenode.exe forget-satellite --all-untrusted --identity-dir C:\Identity\storagenode\ --config-dir C:\Program Files\Storj\Storage Node\
2023-10-11T14:18:04+03:00 INFO Anonymized tracing enabled {“process”: “storagenode”}
Error: cannot specify both satellite IDs and --all-untrusted
thank you now i found that it shold work like this
storagenode.exe forget-satellite --all-untrusted --identity-dir C:\Identity\storagenode --config-dir “C:\Program Files\Storj\Storage Node” and cmd should run as administrator
Update: but it not working, it looks like do nothing. or it happen in background for some day?
I mean folder delete process.
As I have lot of win gui nodes in one pc I tried also
C:\Program Files\Storj\Storage Node>storagenode.exe forget-satellite --all-untrusted --identity-dir C:\Identity4\storagenode --config-dir “C:\Program Files\Storj4\Storage Node” --server.private-address 127.0.0.1:7782
You also should not specify a satellites IDs if you use--all-untrusted, and you need to have satellitesIDs with hostname and port in the node’s config
likely yes, and you need to use the same private address from the node’s config. If it’s specified as 127.0.0.1:7786, you should use it in this command.
It will not print anything, if the command is succeed.
no. I think than even providing a private address should not be the case, but well, we have the similar problem with graceful exit and I do not know, is it fixed or not: