A 36-month restructuring and business plan for Storj — without reducing SNO compensation I want Storj to survive, and I am prepared to contribute real work toward that outcome. But survival cannot mean transferring the consequences of failed sales expansion, failed product bets, inadequate customer…

@arrogantrabbit That is where we fundamentally disagree. Reduce payments until SNOs start actually leaving. Then increase them a bit. That basically means finding the lowest acceptable payout by waiting until operators actually start leaving. For a storage network, I think that is far too risky…

[image] alpharabbit: …while Inveniam is fighting a much bigger war… I never looked at them when they bought Storj. But when I did finally look: it’s a maze of ownership layers and crypto investments that seem to be selling ownership shares in old companies… to buy ownership shares in new comp…

@Roxor A few points: First, the $0.15/TB cut was only the first step, and it affected storage compensation, not egress. Second, I think you are seriously underestimating the network risk. After removing safeguards like the 24-hour rule, the amount of coordinated or malicious capacity needed to cre…

[image] GfTmbH: After removing safeguards like the 24-hour rule, the amount of coordinated or malicious capacity needed to create a serious availability and repair problem becomes much smaller. Saying the guy who created the biggest cluster risk under old placement rules. …

Say what you like, since there’s no way to verify it. The only way I’d believe it is if you and your associates actually announce a shutdown timeframe, even if it’s 5 minutes, and demonstrate that you can break the network. If you did that, it would be a powerful demonstration and you’d have much …

@elek but this you should fix anyway [Bildschirmfoto 2026-09-16 um 17.42.57] link is 404: https://www.storj.io/pricing/change-FAQs (customer access storj.io )

[image] STATION-I: You cannot cite only one side of that history and then conclude that operators who professionalized and expanded somehow ignored Storj’s messaging. No, that’s exactly what I’m stating. Literally: Operators who professionalized and expanded ignored Storj’s messaging exemplif…

[image] GfTmbH: link is 404: https://www.storj.io/pricing/change-FAQs (customer access storj.io ) Thanks the report. It worked only with lower case (faq) letters. Changed it back to upper case.

5.1.12 through 5.1.16 are duplicates of 5.1.7 through 5.1.11 if that helps :zany_face:

Yes, I shared this with the team. We updated prices, but didn’t clean duplications.

@littleskunk did you check the new numbers? Have you forwarded my plan?

Storj Community Forum (official)

How to Survive - without reducing SNO compensation

Ideas & Suggestions