for me it more looks like unvetted nodes get more data, as there is low amount of them,
if we watch stats Storj Network Statistics - Grafana (storjstats.info) there is about -164 unvetted nodes, looks like somewhere is error, how can be unvetted nodes in minus
the negative number of unvetted nodes is just a display error, this is not an issue with the Storj source data used to make these graphs. The author of the dashboard would have to fix it.
i think it is because unvetted nodes get fixed amount of data, but there is very low amount of unvetted nodes, as vetting process is go faster today.
i think this 5% should be scalable dawn in unvetted nodes is low some step by step logic.
Going off my likely faulty memory, I recall that 5% may be related to the percentage of new nodes being selected vs vetted nodes, and not 5% more data. In other words, your odds of getting data increases if your node isn’t vetted.
Like BrightSilence mentioned, vetted and non-vetted are in two different pools, so in order for non-vetted to receive data a portion is included in the selection process of available nodes to receive data.
Keep in mind as well that nodes can lose the race to neighbors who are faster/closer to the uploader. So, if your node is faster it should gain more data than a slower node.
My youngest node finished vetting at major satellites at around 500 GB of stored data, so that would match. But it’s vetting that counts here, not the amount of stored data.