If you have just moved to Cloudflare and you are seeing a 521 over HTTPS, it is possible that your origin server has not been configured to allow port 443 be accessed by Cloudflare IPs. In this case you should configure your server/firewall to being listening on port 443 and allow us to be able to conect. If this is not possible, you can move to using âFlexibleâ SSL under the SSL/TLS app on the dashboard.
I didn´t know how to allow port 443 be accessed by Cloudflare IPs so i switched the settings to âflexible sslâ
Iâm not accustomed to troubleshooting Cloudflare issues, but Iâll try to help. Can you still reach the linksharing page directly, without Cloudflare? The URLS would be in the form https://link.storjshare.io/s/<access-id>/<path> Do you get the same failure if you use Cloudflare with the CNAME of link.us1.storjshare.io?
Let me start at the beginning a bit. Storj has a native protocol that isnât HTTP based. Those sj:// link only work with the native âUplinkâ command line client. We also have an S3 compatible endpoint (which uses HTTP but doesnât expose your data publicly) and Linksharing (which uses HTTP and makes your data public). The âaccess-idâ I mentioned is the âstorj-accessâ value you used when setting up your DNS record.
You can definitely use Linksharing without following CloudFront. The steps you took are what youâd do if you wanted 1) a custom URL and 2) SSL/TLS. If you donât need TLS/SSL, you can just set it to âoffâ in CloudFlare and possibly skip Cloudflare completely. If you donât need a custom domain, you can skip CloudFlare and the DNS setup, yet still have TLS.
So assuming you want a 1) public website with 2) a custom domain and 3) TLS/SSL, youâre on the right track. If your page is truly public, are you comfortable sharing the access-id, so I can check from here? Otherwise Iâd try to build a URL that looks like this one again: https://link.storjshare.io/s/<access-id>/<bucket>/<path>, EG: edge | Storj DCS.
Endpoint : https://gateway.storjshare.io
Public Access: true
=========== DNS INFO =====================================================================
Remember to update the $ORIGIN with your domain name. You may also change the $TTL.
$ORIGIN example.com.
$TTL 3600
www.mylife.plus IN CNAME link.storjshare.io.
if i create an access grant and name it mylife and then i import it into the CLI with this command
uplink access import main 1cCYAHiNyogwPRkZbkpo8C6txEeJ4cktWZoHzwAKTwNzGeAKhXyJZojfb8jSGGFSAc5M3zGgswJQXVEkrJ8na6nj4aeRRdtwvjgGFC5GXmgLFgBPn8EtwtmCHhcojrawXbWCdciN7RYGU3c4Lo7JQGxZuaNDGnMfprYGGqkuFXQuVNx4j6EyCxPP9ekhPa8NEh6ZLSLB7Cjf7...
do i have to call âmainâ âmylifeâ or is âmainâ just the name to store the access grant on my local pc?
Also if i create an access grant i generate a passphrase. What is this passphrase for? Do i use this passphrase to access the bucket? So if i create a new bucket with a new passphrase i need also a new access grant? so each bucket has its own access grant?
This is an access grant, you can import it to uplink CLI or use in FileZilla, or any other tool, which have a Storj integration. Or you may form an URL to your object like this: https://link.storjshare.io/s/here-is-your-access-grant/my-bucket/my-file.png, but itâs less secure than using your Access Key ID, because access grant contains the all required information to get an access to the bucket(s), prefix(es), object(s), project (only with root access grant, generated in the satellite UI). Since you used a shared access grant, itâs derived from your root access grant and has restricted permissions to only this bucket and thus you didnât breach your security. Just do not post your root access grant - it gives full permissions to your project.
exactly
This is a secret key for your access key. Using Access Key ID, Secret Key and Endpoint you can configure aws CLI or any other S3-compatible tool to have an access to your buckets and objects via S3 protocol.
Because now linksharing service is routed automatically to closest location of your clients. But you still can use explicit name of the region, if you would like.
I checked your access - it looks correct, there is only one file accessible - index.html: index.html | Storj
Since itâs small, itâs stored inline on your satellite, thus has 0 nodes.
this.
This is encryption phrase, itâs used to derive encryption keys and encrypt your objects during upload and decrypt to show and download.
The encryption phrase can be the same or different. However, to have an access to objects in that bucket you should use the same phrase used during upload.
Moreover - you can upload every single object with a different encryption phrase. But you will see objects only with âtheirâ encryption phrase.
Access grant is generated with the provided encryption phrase. So, if you used a different encryption phrase for the other bucket - you should generate an access grant with that phrase for that bucket to be able to import it to uplink or generate S3 credentials and have an access to objects in this bucket.
Is it possible to create a static website where i can display all my storj buckets with the foders/files in it and give users access to different folders via email/password or something like this?
It will not be static anymore - you would request login and password from users. For that you need a dynamic site.
You can upload objects to the bucket with a different encryption phrase (for example - provided by your users) and when they want to access them back - they should use the same encryption phrase, otherwise the bucket will look like empty. But you need to implement a UI + backend for that, and I do not think itâs possible to implement such UI + backend only client-side.
The TTL for your domain is 3600. So you need to wait for a hour while you changes will be fully populated and 2 hours for TXT records.
is the encryption key another name for the secret key? so the access key is like the public key and the encryption key/ secret key is like my private key ?
Access Key ID and Secret Key are S3-compatible credentials, they are generated when you register your access grant on GatewayMT or GatewayST. You can consider these credentials as random - you cannot derive your encryption key from them, they just unlock your access grant on Gateway to have an access to your buckets and objects. The encryption key embedded to the access grant will allow you encrypt/decrypt your objects.
In these S3 credentials the Secret Key is your private key to access Gateway, yes.
The encryption key in the access grant is your private key to decrypt your objects in buckets, however the whole access grant should be considered as a private key, especially root one, because it contains full information, required to have an access to your object(s), bucket(s) and project.
If this is a root access grant (created in the satellite UI without limits) it gives full permissions to the entire project. Anyone who have a root access grant will have the same permissions as you.
See Access Management | Storj Docs
You can check the access grant with uplink access inspect 12BRU.... to see, what it contains.
For the named access âmainâ:
uplink access inspect main
So be careful when you share your access grant. Only limited access grants (i.e. for the one object or one bucket with limited permissions like read-only) can be considered relatively safe.
If you share with uplink share --url it will generate an URL containing only Access Key ID (âloginâ part of GatewayMT credentials). It will allow only read-only access to the shared bucket(s), prefix(es), object(s). Having only Access Key ID nobody can get more information, like what permissions it have or what encryption and API key was used.