STORJ is real money. There was an ICO… and the collateral was/is the technology. In this way, STORJ is at least comparable to fiat money which uses GDP and future production capabilities… along with guns – lots of guns… So, I’d rather have STORJ which doesn’t require guns.
1 Like
Can you explain that part. I only read guns without understanding the background of that. I must be missing something.
I would go far as to say 12000 guns to replace the departing 12000
His setup is different. He is running his satellite on different hardware. Again we learned a lot from his setup that helped us to improve the tardigrade satellites.
Stop making wrong assumptions. If one of your questions doesn’t get answered it might be because we simply missed it. Again please expect positive intends from your commincation partners. That alone will solve a lot of problems.
I’m no Krugman fan. In fact, much of what is written about economic policies is 100% wrong 99% of the time… However, there’s a kernel of truth in some of what he says:
1 Like
Why are you still using an expensive (and slow) cloud instead of a dedicated server in Hetzner or OVH?
As far as I know Stefan use read hardware instead of cloud.
I’m just an SNO, not a client.
I’m here for the technical experience at the bleeding edge of the decentralized web. That’s also why I run a public IPFS node as well as my own Jitsi conference server and several other experiments.
1 Like
I think it is quote from the matrix
It is a quote from The Matrix but I meant it seriously… in the same way as Krugman.
And here’s a reddit discussion on the topic… via r/bitcoin …
…which presents several views that mirror my own.
Yes that makes sense. Thank you for explaining.
Oh shoot… never read this thread and stumbled upon it. I have two nodes running on one machine due to a stupid DQ and want to go back to one, so as on the nodes left on the first node I saw the node from stefan has only 35.1 GB …
Been on that for 16 months and thought I can do a GE now and will get back the hold amount?
It shows successful and I have a Completion Receipt as well - so should be good?
If your GE is successful - then you will receive a payout.
There are some storagenodes affected by a bug. Most of started GE has finished it successfully, but if your node has corrupted pieces, it will more likely to fail. This should not be like this, but currently it is.
This is why I recommend do not start the GE until all fixes are deployed.
I thought that 1.9.5 is include all of them, but as turned out, I knew not all the cases. So, we should wait for all fixes.
4 Likes
Thanks for the clarification - so I should see a decent payout end of month for this satellite.
Some SNO want to get/save [big] money here and now.
it takes pennies to make dollars or euros and rubles
well does this mean that Stefen-benten satellite has be shut down 2020-08-08T16:45:06.153Z ERROR contact:service ping satellite failed {“Satellite ID”: “118UWpMCHzs6CvSgWd9BfFVjw5K9pZbJjkfZJexMtSkmKxvvAW”, “attempts”: 11, “error”: “ping satellite error: check-in identity error: failed to add peer identity entry for ID: satellitedb: failed to connect to host=10.0.3.20 user=satellite_prod database=satellite_prod: dial error (dial tcp 10.0.3.20:5432: connect: connection refused)”, “errorVerbose”: “ping satellite error: check-in identity error: failed to add peer identity entry for ID: satellitedb: failed to connect to host=10.0.3.20 user=satellite_prod database=satellite_prod: dial error (dial tcp 10.0.3.20:5432: connect: connection refused)\n\tstorj.io/storj/storagenode/contact.(*Service).pingSatelliteOnce:138\n\tstorj.io/storj/storagenode/contact.(*Service).pingSatellite:95\n\tstorj.io/storj/storagenode/contact.(*Chore).updateCycles.func1:87\n\tstorj.io/common/sync2.(*Cycle).Run:152\n\tstorj.io/common/sync2.(*Cycle).Start.func1:71\n\tgolang.org/x/sync/errgroup.(*Group).Go.func1:57”
No, probably maintenance. It’s been dropping in and out for a bit. But it’s online now. Might still be ongoing though.
no it’s still down here same message
