I have not questioned that. But Storj should not tell that to me, they should make it clear for potential customers. That’s marketing.
There is more than media production workflows:
Just recently, there have been more or less credible rumors that a major surveillance customer has switched from one competitor of Storj to another. Both competitors explicitly market their offerings as storage solutions tailored for “surveillance” needs. Notably, it appears that this customer has not transitioned their data to Storj.
Whether this customer has ever considered Storj or even heard of it remains speculative. However, the mere thought that a potential Storj customer might overlook Storj while actively seeking storage alternatives for their surveillance data is disheartening.
When faced with competing companies, one providing media production workflow storage and while (multiple) others offering a dedicated “surveillance cloud” solution, to which one would you prioritize to talk to?
It would be at no cost for Storj to design its website in a way that it better targets a broad variety of relevant industries seeking cloud storage solutions, rather than focusing so much on media production that it appears the sole purpose of Storj storage are media production workflows.