Yes. We are working on it. But we do not want to introduce a some kind of a breaking changes… so, you likely would have less profit using the techniques to bypass /24 rule over the time.
1 Like
I can’t see test uploads atm. Is it only my nodes or is the test over?
It’s not just you. My nodes are showing almost no traffic for a couple hours now.
Good thing to stop the hype
3 Likes
Is there any notice about the next steps that Bryanm talked about?
Short update. The upload script error out because it hit the project limit. We could bump the limit and continue but the limit was set very high already. Looks more like there might be a problem with the project limits cache especially in combination with a high amount of TTL data. The team will need a moment to look into that. Might take a day or so.
11 Likes
This is your cloud providers limit? AWS, Azure? Just curious.
Probably lots of new SNOs in this lately for the wrong reasons.
1 Like
What do you mean, “wrong reasons”?
Surely new people join for the same reason us “oldies” joined as well? 
I suspect that the rapid filling of disks may be creating a misleading impression for new SNOs, which could be contributing to their short tenure. This might be of a concern, as the core concept of this endeavor is centered around long-term availability.
1 Like
Ah, I see. Fair concern, although if the current data pattern is a simulation of what’s to come (a big “if”, I know), then hopefully the new SNOs will get what they were expecting anyway…
I was thinking of individuals who are tempted to buy or build large storage servers, lured by the promise of quick profits or considering a shift of their massive capacity from Chia to Storj. Recently, I’ve come across several posts from people considering to invest and are apparently drawn in by the seemingly massive influx of data. New Storage Node Operators (SNOs) might get the impression that this is the norm and that it will continue like this indefinitely.
However, the reality is that if there’s a massive overcapacity, it will ultimately lead to reduced payouts for everyone involved and make people quitting more likely.
4 Likes
If so, they are the SNOs you don’t need anyway. You need “loyal” SNOs who stay, even when the traffic/payout is low. SNOs who come primarily for high payouts will leave as soon as the payouts are dropping.
interesting. i have new node that is 4 day old started on 14 july.
the interesting fakt is that it contains 4x more client data than test data.
Why? Isn’t a permanent come and go much better for storj because of payment held back? 
I have 80 Mbit ingress from storj (ip: 79.127.226.99), but nothing in logs about uploads from saltlake sat. This is planned behavior? Log speed also is not like something uploading on 80 megabits.
may be this is the new client that we waited for.
This ip is used a lot for US1 uploads in my logs.
last days i had 250-300 GB/day ingress from saltlake. today it stopped tho
