Indeed, you should be.
Because it broke a Western public rule: freedom of speech, without hurting people without any necessity.
In my opinion it was a sane discussion, on ToS not being aligned with current practice aside from being malwritten and vague.
But I won’t say too much, my edit of the last post in that topic tells my stance towards it. Just like counting the hearts might tell you about the stance of the community, although my cordial appreciation of your knowledge and efforts in this forum.
You’re taking a stance, that’s not juridical in my opinion and you’re implicitly (and sometimes explicitly) forcing us to take the same point of view. That’s the ‘great Leader’ about. But feel free to ban me or whatever you want for it. But giving space to different points of view, might benefit the community and Storj in the end.
I’m just a little bit amused by the way Storj is handling it and a little bit annoyed by the way you’re handling the discussions about it. That’s all 
Indeed, since no version keeping the ToS is void now anyway. Because everyone is bound to the agreement at the moment they agree, and any subsequent changes need to be agreed to explicitly.
So, from a juridical point of view, we’re discussing about nothing. No matter your point of view concerning the interpretation of the content of it.