It is pretty hard to discuss stuff when we live in totally different realities.
Let me describe a hypothetical situation as an analogy.
There are 3 coffee bean companies. They are called, PremiumBean, GenericBrand and BlackRifle.
PremiumBean | GenericBrand | BlackRifle | |
---|---|---|---|
Quality: | They offer award-winning high-quality premium beans. | These are the generic medium-quality beans you can find in any Walmart/ASDA/Aldi. | These are the generic medium-quality beans you can find in any Walmart/ASDA/Aldi. The quality of the packaging is not very good. |
Reputation: | They are an old trusted brand and thus known by customers. | They are a cheap alternative brand and thus known by customers. | There are pretty new and small, customer knowledge is pretty limited. |
price per 1kg: | 100$ | 21$ | 20$ |
volume: | 100t | 100t | 1t |
PremiumBean and GenericBrand have in common, that they only process their own coffee beans. They own the farmland, employ their own farmers, and roast the beans themselves.
BlackRifle does it differently. There are independent farmers that farm and roast their beans and sell them to BlackRifle. BlackRifle packages the roasted Beans and sells the finished product.
Currently, BlackRifle suffers multiple problems.
Problem 1: They only sell 1t a month. That is nothing compared to the other companies
Problem 2: Because of that very low volume, BlackRifle only buys very small amounts from farmers. New farmers can only sell a fraction of the coffee they produce.
Problem 3: Farmers donāt have a contract with BlackRifle. They have no idea how much they will get paid in the future per kg, nor do they know how many BlackRifle will buy from them. That makes planning for farmers very difficult and investing a gamble.
Problem 4: The packaging is of poor quality. Lots of buyers hesitate to buy BlackRifle because of that, despite the slightly lower pricing than GenericBrand.
Problem 5: BlackRifle loses money with every pack they sell. They currently pay the farmers 20$ per kg and need another 10$ for the packaging. They only can do that because of VC money.
Discussing these problems with other farmers in the BlackRifle forum is difficult, because we canāt agree on where we stand at the moment. IF you believe in my understanding of the current situation, some arguments from the other farmers almost seem delusional.
Farmer 1: It is unsustainable for us farmers! We need higher prices than 20$ per kg from BlackRifle.
Me: That does not make any sense. They are already selling it at a loss and now you want even more?
Farmer 2: It is getting unsustainable for me. I need wood for my roasting machine and wood prices have risen.
Me: You shouldnāt have bought wood in the first place but only use unused wood you get from your land. If you invest money by buying wood, you have to compete with the big guys. They use big solar installations, there is no way you can get costs down to their level on a bigger scale.
Farmer 3: BlackRifle undersells themselves. They should spike prices and compete with PremiumBean.
Me: We arenāt even really competing with GenericBrands on a quality level. You always claim that BlackRifle is on the same quality level as PremiumBeans but that is just wishful thinking and not backed by any award.
Farmer 4: Damn, that coffee-selling business is hard. The margins are way too low! We should sell Nespresso like coffee machines that only work with BlackRifle. Then we can sell pads at way higher prices.
Me: Before the BlackRifle factory workers start building coffee machines, can they please get the packaging done right first?
BlackRifle PR 1: Blackrifle is 80% cheaper than PremiumBean!
Me: Sure, but that is only true if you buy a single pack, which nobody does. If you buy it in a multipack, prices go way down. Also, you canāt really compare the two, PremiumBean plays in a completely different league. My suggestion would be, ditch the military look of the packaging. You scare away more people than you attract by that.
Farmer 5: But you do know, that the US military is our largest customer?
BlackRifle PR 2: Actually that is not true. US military only makes up only for a fraction of our sales.
Me: Then I even understand less why you would not ditch the military look!
Farmer 6: Sure times are currently rough, but just wait until the new US military budget comes out!
Me: What makes you think, that the budget will be higher and not lower?
What if it is already at its peak?
And even if it gets bigger, what makes you think, that the military needs coffee?
And even if they need coffee, why should they buy it from us and not from PremiumBrand or GenericBrand?
BlackRifle employee 2: Dear farmers, please donāt invest in any new tools! We will shortly have some adjustments and lower prices!
Farmer 7: I think that it is wrong from BlackRifle to discourage farmers from investing! If we donāt invest, we will never be able to sell 100t a month
Me: We currently canāt even sell more than 1t a month! Letās try to sell our overproduction first before we ramp up production even more.
In case you need help for the analogy:
PremiumBean = AWS
GenericBrand = Wasabi, Backblaze, Ionos
BlackRifle = STORJ
farmer = node operator
packaging = S3 compatibility
Nespresso = Photo or Backup solutions
US military = Web3 adoption