Hello! Payouts for the completed month of September are done. (They were actually done a week ago, but this forum post is manual and I’ve been busy!)
zkSync Era
zkSync Era payments went off without trouble again this month; we paid 460 unique addresses, which is once again the most yet! zkSync Era adopters received a 3% bonus and were paid out if they cleared the minimum payout threshold, which appears to have been at least $0.09.
You can opt into zkSync Era adding the following to your config file:
operator.wallet-features: ["zksync-era"]
or to your commandline:
--operator.wallet-features=zksync-era
Note that you need to update your configuration if you formerly had opted into vanilla zkSync Lite.
Layer 1
For layer 1 payments, we paid 3,555 unique wallet addresses. This month is the first month testing some new automation in our automated Ethereum transaction pipeline, and we discovered we had a bug with minimum payment threshold calculation a bit too late. We paid everyone who earned $11.64 or more, but also paid 22% of wallets that earned less. This is resolved for future months.
A reminder that the minimum payout threshold is currently set such that fees are not to exceed 25% of the transferred amount.
Cost basis tool
Just a reminder that if you want to know the amount of USD a particular storage node payment transaction was considered denominated in, please check out our cost basis tool. You’ll need to enter your payment transaction:
And in the MND dashboard I can’t change the page to see all the wallet addresses in the Wallet section, another thing that should be improved, because for now you can only see 2 per page
Oops, I had a bug in my query that inspected the new payout system for what the largest amount we skipped due to transaction fees was. I’ll update my top line post but it was actually $11.63, not $9.87.
I increased the limit from 2 to 5.
Vue was confused between the built in Pagination and Vuetify Pagination so the Pagination wasn’t working so I renamed it from VPagination to Pagination. PR
I’d vote for node name. Always imagine the multinode is for multiple nodes and should help to manage a large number of nodes. The node id is terrible to work with.
However normally all nodes must be using the same wallet. So you could offer a view that displays the nodes per wallet address. Then it would be easy (for example in case you have to switch to a different wallet address) to see if all nodes have been migrated successfully or if (some) nodes still have the old address.
Yeah, I was also wondering that. I’ll work on that after my node name PR gets merged as it has the ability to add node name while adding nodes. So that we can ensure that all the nodes have their names.
Also talking about PR’s, @Alexey I think this is a great time to merge some of them. As I recently updated them and Jenkins is also happy with most of them, and some of them are waiting for only one review.
