I only see wasted storage space. Is it for sale? ![]()
Itās art. Of course itās for sale⦠![]()
Modern art i just meh!
This is exactly what Iāve done now. The raspberry pis could not handle the recent test data and my nodes were crashing several times daily. Now I have them connected to a SAS controller from eBay on a >10 yr old 8GB RAM, AMD Phenom II X4 system I had around.
At this moment Iām receiving [test data] at 240mbit/s, sitting at a load average ~40 and my nodes are stable.
So I had an old ReadyNAS Pro 6 which I bought over 10 years ago.
Netgear discontinued the whole product line and I was about to take it to the recycling centre but when I opened it to see what was inside I saw a VGA header on the motherboard.
So I got a cable and sure enough was able to get into the BIOS.
Turns out itās just a PC using the now-obsolete ReadyNAS OS.
So I installed Debian into a HDD and put Grub on the built-in USB boot-drive.
Iām going to upgrade the CPU to a Core 2 Duo E7600 and add a couple more sticks of RAM (it only takes 8 GB maximum), put a small SSD as boot drive and should be able to run one or two nodes.
Itās only SATA-II but should still be more reliable than USB3 for the HDD connection.
I only wish I knew how to change the Display from āReadyNASā to either āStorjā or some sort of more useful information (like throughput, load average, IOWait, or something like that)
I love repurposing old tech which otherwise would just be in the scrapyard ![]()
That display must be controlled by something. Dosenāt have anything in the BIOS?
Nothing obvious or that I can make any sense out ofā¦
Well, this is interesting.
Turns out it says RNDP6000 on the label but also RD-6B which apparently is a ReadyNAS Ultra6 and not Pro 6.
And all these years I thought I had a Pro! ![]()
Lovely bits of kit, the chassis is so solid and well assembled! Such a shame they were cannedā¦
Just a quick search, donāt know if it helpsā¦
https://embedded-lab.com/blog/lab-15-scrolling-text-message-on-an-led-dot-matrix-display/
Thatās way beyond my level of ability, unfortunately ![]()
30TB CMR!!! Weāre going to need a new log entryā¦
YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ INFO lazyfilewalker.used-space-filewalker subprocess terminated: filewalker gave up and went home {āProcessā: āstoragenodeā, āsatelliteIDā: ā12L9ZFwhzVpuEKMUNUqkaTLGzwY9G24tbiigLiXpmZWKwmcNDDsā}
Pre-requisite states to use max 24TB drive. Also higher drives canāt keep using 4KB clusters. I am actually looking forward to their performance on Storj.
The 32TB is SMR, canāt wait to see the first SNO asking for help⦠![]()
That would be dependent on OS i guess, windows is 8k clusters since bigger than 16TB.
AFAIK
My 20TB 8k cluster runs verry well. it jumped from 5 to 8TB used, in this month.
Not on lousy file systems.
ā¦$ truncate -s $((1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)) testfs
ā¦$ ls -lh testfs
-rw-r--r-- 1 ⦠1.0P Jun 10 23:43 testfs
ā¦$ time /sbin/mkfs.ext4 testfs
mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
Discarding device blocks: 0/27487790694done
Creating filesystem with 274877906944 4k blocks and 4160749568 inodes
Filesystem UUID: 696b877e-0130-4ca7-a4fb-36a19e13745a
Superblock backups stored on blocks: ā¦
ā¦$ stat testfs
File: testfs
Size: 1125899906842624 Blocks: 9437720 IO Block: 4096 regular file
ā¦
ā¦$ /sbin/dumpe2fs -h testfs | grep Block.size
dumpe2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
Block size: 4096
I believe you can go way up with ext4 and x64bit OS, using 4K format.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/ext4/overview.html#blocks



