Nothing faster available here. Thus the question about TTL.
If you could do this: wouldnāt it mean a SNO is exerting control over when a paying client deletes their files? Like that client is saying āplease store this, Iāll pay you, and delete it in 3 monthsāā¦ and you say āno, I wonāt store it if you want to delete it in 3 monthsā?
I could see the dashboard (or scripts) maybe getting upgrades to report on TTL info. But SNOs shouldnāt get to pick-and-choose the data they store (if they want to get paid).
(butā¦ if your node magically lost every race to accept TTL dataā¦ I donāt see how Storj would know if that was intentional or accidentalā¦ youād just make less money)
2 Likes
How many nodes? if you canā¦
choiceofn with n=6 has broken a new record and was about 20% faster than we would need. For some reason not for long. The performance decreased. We will now run with a bit less load for a longer time to see if it is stable.
How does it look on your side? Do you see any issues why the performance might decrease?
5 Likes
You Maxed my 500 mbit connection now
We reduced our benchmark test a bit. It is not running stable about 5% faster than required. It looks like we can hold that level.
There still is some fine tuning but I guess we can start celebrating.
10 Likes
My unvetted potato nodes doing best with this oneā¦ 
2 Likes
I donāt know why my nodes at home arenāt getting that much load. I think my cgnat and the VPN from portmap is the problem. Does anyone know a better way to get nodes behind a cgnat working?
Th3Van.dk
2 Likes
Anyone here with a high success rate that can tell me how much bandwidth this is consuming. Sounds like more than 500MBit/s? How much is it?
This is what I see on the node in Washington (state). The darkstat is monitoring virtual adapter where there is only node. Connection is symmetric gigabit.
1 Like
I am sorry. Can you translate these numbers for me? I donāt know where to look at.
Sure, past 40 or so minutes average ingress to that node was 28000 kilobytes per second, which translates to about 225 megabit/second. It uses a quarter of available gigabit bandwidth.
3 Likes
If you wanted to let it cook 24h or soā¦ to see if nodes report issues (as not everybody is watching here, but would notice your-node-is-offline emails)ā¦ then that would be fine by me! 
Oh, and congrats for hitting your numbers! Cash bonuses for every member of the team! 
That test is planned for later maybe tomorrow. I think today we will first do the thing with excluding 20% of the nodes and also reduce the long tail to make this even more resource friendly.
3 Likes
This is cool:
4 core VM, so 400% would be max
The CPU usage is distributed evenly among the cores, which is nice (yeah, total CPU usage is higher than that node process - my scripts that parse logs also need resources).
2 Likes
I have to admit these tests are really putting my mind at rest and make me realise even a potato node can handle a lot of hammering if itās dedicated only for Storj.
My PI5s are doing just fine.
I have a very old rack mount NAS running 3 (unvetted) nodes. It only has a Celeron J3355 and 2 GB of RAM. Itās being fairly squeezed but itās handling over 100MBit traffic and could possibly do a bit more if I didnāt have other machines running nodes on the same IP.
2 Likes
i think You forgot to turn back On the ip /24 net rule,
a node that shares ip with 3-4 others is hiting his network max ingress right now ;>
and it never does
(edit okay currently 1 neighbor, so total 2 on same ip,
You made a miracle,
You chased out my unwanted neighbors:)
maybe theirs nodes crashed:P )
Edit2:
bedise that, i like how low RAM usage storagenode.exe service is using (only like 500MB, not any crazy 2000MB)
That rule should still be in place.
1 Like