Hello, do you know if you can receive payments in the “zksync era” network for the next month?
I have seen some configuration in this regard, but the zksync lite network and “zksync era” were set at the same time and I don’t know if it is correct to receive it in the new network.
Storj Integrates With zkSync Era to Bring Faster, More Secure Payment Systems to Decentralized Storage
Instructions on how to signal that you would like to receive zkSync Era payouts once they become available are here:
Hello! Payouts for the completed month of June are complete.
First off, there is a new round of
payout rate changes just announced, taking effect July 1. Please make sure to read this, and provide feedback at our open for comments thread.
For layer 1 payments, we paid 1,342 unique wallet addresses. There is no specific minimum payment threshold but it appears the pipeline was able to pay out for people who earned $14.68 or more.
For zkSync Legacy payments, we paid 1,822 unique wallet addresse…
OP asked if payments could be received on zksync era next month - not how to configure it.
We do not know at this point. But you may specify it as your preferred wallet feature, placing it on the first place in the option.
Still no storj contract in zksync era network so this month the payments will be delayed too
It’s not delayed, my nodes already received payout via Ethereum.
Or do you mean postponed for your node because you configured as a preferred payout option only zkSync Era and the node did not clear a Minimum Payout Threshold on Ethereum?
In that case you may also add a zkSync Lite to the wallet options list.
Here is how you would specify preferring zkSync Era to zkSync Legacy, and zkSync Legacy to layer 1 in your config file:
operator.wallet-features: ["zksync-era", "zksync"]
And here is how you would specify it on the command line:
I’ve been paid. Considering Monday was a public holiday in Atlanta Storj have done really well this month to get the payments out so fast.
Ok zksync era network?
I see payments on ethereum network and maybe on zksync lite but not in zksync era
Last month the payment for the nodes that opted for zksync era and only set that network was paid a couple of days later at ethereum network because the payments was failed
And I don’t wanna use zksync lite
The payments on zksync era never will happen until there a contract to list the token there and seems that it gonna take some time
No, I’m still on L1. I didn’t enjoy the zksync lite experience so will wait and see how era goes before deciding to move or not.
No updates about the zksync era payments?
The nodes with eth or zksync lite network seems that was paid
Payments are incomplete and still going out. We have not yet sent zksync-era.
One blocker is getting STORJ listed on the zkSync Era bridge. We’re still working on that. If we can’t get that done soon we’ll be sending zksync-era payments via users’ selected fallback mechanism, like last month.
It worked! I got a zksync era payment.
I am bit stuck on withdraw to L1 at the moment as it says 24 hours
nice, configured my nodes rn!
Confirming receipt on my end too - can’t do anything with it right now though since none of the swap mechanisms have support for it yet, but the actual payments work at least!
I’m sure it goes without saying that you can always use the zkSync Era Bridge -
zkSync Era Bridge | Transfer funds between zkSync Era Network and Ethereum Mainnet, but yes, we’re excited to see more things start to add native zkSync Era support for STORJ. The bridging for STORJ token has only been live for under a week!
@heunland made a fantastic discovery, which is that some swapping services already support swapping STORJ to USDC on layer 1 if you type in the STORJ zkSync contract address directly.
For instance, if you go to
Jumper | Multi-Chain Bridging & Swapping (powered by LI.FI), and enter
0xA0806DA7835a4E63dB2CE44A2b622eF8b73B5DB5 as the zkSync token contract address (that is the address of the STORJ bridged token), you should be able to do a swap.
This screenshot is after I entered
0xA0806DA7835a4E63dB2CE44A2b622eF8b73B5DB5 in the “From” field:
hmmm, fees are very low at the moment, so not that i suspect…